U-Carrier Strategy Overview

Results over the full published history, 1997 to September 2026. Net of trading friction.
CAGR12.3%
Maximum drawdown-16.3%
MAR ratio0.76
History29 years (357 months)

U-Carrier is the UCITS version of Carrier, developed by Randy Harris of Dual Momentum Systems for investors outside the United States. Many investors in the UK, Europe, Asia, the Middle East and elsewhere cannot buy US-listed ETFs, or are better served by Irish-domiciled UCITS funds. U-Carrier gives them Carrier's credit-regime strategy built entirely from funds they can hold.

The signal and every rule are Carrier's: the same high yield credit spread, the same Risk On / Risk Off test and the same rebalancing. The full logic, including why Carrier watches the credit market instead of price momentum, is on the Carrier page. This page covers what is different and what to hold.

How It Works

Each month U-Carrier reads the high yield credit spread, the extra yield investors demand to hold below-investment-grade corporate bonds instead of Treasuries.

  • Risk Off when the spread is 6.5% or higher and not yet 2 points below its highest month-end reading of the last six months. U-Carrier then holds intermediate Treasuries.
  • Risk On otherwise, holding its growth portfolio.

Credit stress is rare, so U-Carrier is invested most of the time and changes position less than once a year on average. It rebalances when its position changes, every January, or when a holding drifts more than ten points from its target.

What Is Different From Carrier

Carrier's growth portfolio includes a long/short equity fund (CLSE). There is no UCITS fund that does the same job, so U-Carrier leaves it out and spreads its weight across the remaining holdings:

Risk On holdingCarrierU-Carrier
U.S. large cap50% (IWB)55% (S&P 500, CSPX)
Nasdaq 10020% (QQQ)20% (CNDX)
Managed futures15% (DBMF)25% (DBMF UCITS)
Long/short equity15% (CLSE)none

Why 25% managed futures. The split was chosen by testing managed futures from 10% to 35% in five-point steps. Below 20%, the 2022 bear market sets the worst drawdown and it deepens quickly. From 20% up, the worst drawdown returns to Carrier's level, about -16%. At 25%, U-Carrier matches Carrier's drawdown, did better in 2022, and has the stronger risk-adjusted return since 2013. Every five points of managed futures trades about 0.4% a year of return for a smoother ride, so this is a choice along a line rather than a peak in the backtest.

The UCITS Funds

RoleFundTicker (London, USD)GBP lineISIN
U.S. large capiShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (Acc)CSPXCSP1IE00B5BMR087
Nasdaq 100iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc)CNDXCNX1IE00B53SZB19
Managed futuresiMGP DBi Managed Futures Fund R USD UCITS ETFDBMFDBMGLU2951555585
Risk OffiShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc)CBU0noneIE00B3VWN518

All four are accumulating UCITS funds. The ISIN is the same on every exchange, so it is the surest way to find the right fund at any broker. The S&P 500 fund stands in for Carrier's Russell 1000 fund; the two indexes move very closely together.

Performance Highlights

January 1997 through September 2026, net of trading friction:

CAGRMax DrawdownUlcer IndexUPI
U-Carrier+12.3%-16.3%4.412.30
Carrier+13.8%-16.1%4.692.48
S&P 500+9.9%-51.0%15.110.51

The Ulcer Index measures how deep and how long drawdowns were, not just the single worst one: lower is better. UPI (Ulcer Performance Index) is return above T-bills per unit of Ulcer Index: higher is better.

U-Carrier gives up about 1.5% a year to Carrier over the full history. Most of that gap comes from the years before 2013, and Carrier's long/short fund is represented by reconstructed data before 2010. From 2013 onward the two are close: U-Carrier returned 12.7% a year against Carrier's 13.3%, with a shallower worst drawdown (-13.9% against -16.1%) and a better UPI (2.65 against 2.40). In 2022, the bear market the credit signal cannot see, U-Carrier lost 11.4% against Carrier's 14.1%.

Notes for Investors Outside the US

  • Results are in US dollars. U-Carrier is calculated on the history of the equivalent US funds, in US dollars. If you measure your portfolio in pounds, euros or another currency, your results will also move with the exchange rate.
  • Why UCITS funds. Irish-domiciled UCITS funds are the standard way for non-US investors to hold US markets. They often receive US dividends at a lower withholding rate than a non-US investor holding US-listed ETFs directly would, and they are not US assets for US estate tax purposes. Rules vary by country, so check with a tax adviser where you live.
  • Listings. The tickers above are the London Stock Exchange USD lines. Most of the funds also trade in London in pounds and on European exchanges in euros, under the same ISIN.

Who It's For

U-Carrier is designed for investors outside the US who want:

  • A growth portfolio that stays invested through ordinary corrections.
  • Few trades and long holding periods.
  • A defined, rules-based exit for real credit crises.
  • A strategy built only from UCITS funds they can buy.
  • Optional tactical leverage during recoveries, via U-Carrier 170.

It is likely a poor fit for investors who want the fastest possible exit in a sudden crash, who need protection against every kind of bear market, or who need current income.


Past performance, including backtested results, is not indicative of future results. Backtested performance is hypothetical, does not reflect actual trading, and benefits from hindsight in the selection of strategy rules. U-Carrier is calculated on the history of the equivalent US-listed funds; the UCITS funds track the same or closely matching indexes but their returns will differ, including from fees, tax treatment and currency. Portions of the long-term history rely on reconstructed proxy data for funds that did not exist for the full period, including DBMF. Investors should carefully consider their risk tolerance and consult with a financial advisor.

For the latest details, visit www.DualMomentumSystems.com

Performance in detail

Growth of $10,000 (log scale)

Drawdown from previous high

Calendar-year returns

Selected range Jan 1997 to Sep 2026

PortfolioCAGRMax DDUlcerUPISortinoMAR
U-Carrier12.3%-16.3%4.412.301.890.76
Carrier13.8%-16.1%4.692.482.050.86
S&P 5009.9%-51.0%15.110.511.050.19
60/407.8%-32.3%7.260.771.290.24

What the record shows

From Jan 1997 through Sep 2026, U-Carrier compounded at 12.3% a year after trading costs. $10,000 invested at the start grew to about $316,629.

That is 1.5 points a year less than Carrier, its default benchmark, over the same months, and it trailed Carrier in all 4 decades in the record.

Its deepest decline was 16.3%, from a peak in Oct 2001 to a low in Apr 2002, and it was back to its old high by May 2003.

Return is only half the picture. The Ulcer Performance Index measures return against the depth and length of drawdowns, and on it U-Carrier scores 2.30, behind Carrier at 2.48.

In the 126 months the S&P 500 fell, U-Carrier still made money in 27% of them.

Since 2000

The modern half of the record, with the dot-com bust, 2008, the long zero-rate decade and the 2022 rate shock all inside it.

Jan 2000 to Sep 2026CAGRMax DDUlcerUPISortinoMAR
U-Carrier10.8%-16.3%4.551.971.740.67
Carrier11.8%-16.1%4.842.041.830.73
S&P 5008.1%-51.0%15.890.390.880.16
60/406.6%-32.3%7.620.621.110.20

Return by decade

Annual return1990s*2000s2010s2020s*
U-Carrier+26.4%+10.5%+9.5%+13.3%
Carrier+33.9%+11.9%+10.3%+13.8%
S&P 500+27.5%-1.0%+12.9%+15.3%
60/40+18.7%+2.1%+9.4%+9.4%

* Partial decade, annualized over the months available.

Through the hard stretches

Total return over each period, start of the first month to the end of the last.

PeriodU-CARCARS&P 50060/40
Dot-com bear marketSep 2000 to Sep 2002+3.9%+6.4%-44.8%-23.5%
Global financial crisisNov 2007 to Feb 2009-7.3%-7.8%-51.0%-32.3%
COVID crashFeb 2020 to Mar 2020-13.9%-15.2%-19.6%-11.9%
2022 rate shockJan 2022 to Dec 2022-11.4%-14.1%-18.2%-15.9%

How it behaves month to month

Since Jan 1997Worst 12 monthsPositive monthsPositive when S&P 500 fellCorrelation to S&P 500
U-Carrier-11.4%65%27%0.69
Carrier-14.1%66%28%0.69
60/40-27.5%65%6%0.98

Every figure is net of trading costs and computed from the same monthly data as the rest of the site, over the months all the portfolios shown have in common (Jan 1997 to Sep 2026). Returns before an ETF's launch come from a matching index, as explained in where the data comes from. Backtests are hypothetical and are not a promise of future results.