Global Navigator 200 cover art

Global Navigator 200 Strategy Overview

Results over the full published history, 1980 to August 2026. Net of trading friction.
CAGR17.0%
Maximum drawdown-23.1%
MAR ratio0.74
History46 years (560 months)

Global Navigator 200 is Global Navigator with one change: during the recovery phase of a U.S. equity drawdown, and only then, the equity position is held through a 2x S&P 500 ETF (SSO) instead of an unleveraged one (IWB). Every other rule is identical. Same momentum measure, same Risk On / Risk Off test, same regional rotation, same Treasury Duration Limiter.

This page is about that substitution. The base strategy's three-step logic and its defensive ladder are on the Global Navigator page and are not repeated here.

What the 200 means

Global Navigator is always 100% in a single position when it is Risk On. There are no sleeves to leverage partially, so the arithmetic is as simple as it gets: substituting a 2x fund for the whole equity position doubles the portfolio's notional exposure to 200%.

That is a stronger statement than it is for a sleeve-based strategy. Triad 135 leverages one 35% sleeve and reaches 135% notional. Global Navigator 200 leverages everything it owns. When leverage is deployed, the entire portfolio is a 2x S&P 500 position.

Notional exposure is 100% whenever leverage is dormant, which is most of the time, and 200% when it is not.

How Smart Leverage decides

Dormant. Nothing happens. The intended holding passes through untouched and Global Navigator 200 holds exactly what Global Navigator holds.

Armed. U.S. large cap has closed a month 10% or more below its highest prior month-end close. That is the only trigger. Arming and deploying cannot happen in the same month, so there is always at least a one-month gap between the drawdown being recognised and leverage going on.

Deployed. From armed, leverage deploys in the first month where U.S. large cap has better weighted-average momentum than T-bills and the strategy actually wants to own U.S. large cap. Both conditions, not either.

That second condition does real work here. Global Navigator's Step 1 decides whether to be in equities at all and Step 2 decides which region. Smart Leverage sits downstream of both and cannot override either. If the strategy is Risk Off, there is nothing to leverage. If it prefers international, there is no IWB position to substitute.

The three exits

  • Momentum turns. T-bills catch up to or pass U.S. large cap on the weighted-average measure.
  • Any Risk Off month. The strategy leaves equities entirely and the leveraged position goes with it.
  • The 13-month cap. No deployment runs longer than 13 consecutive months. The figure is 13 rather than 12 so a deployment running its full length clears the one-year holding period for long-term capital gains treatment.

One trigger, one deployment

When a deployment ends, for any reason, the drawdown that armed it is spent. Favorable momentum the next month does not redeploy it. Only a fresh 10% drawdown from a new peak can arm it again.

Prolonging the Magic

This is the rule that is specific to Global Navigator, and it exists because this strategy rotates between regions in a way Triad does not.

If the strategy rotates from U.S. to international while leverage is already deployed, the deployment survives and the leveraged position is held through the rotation. The reasoning is that leverage was committed to a recovery that is still underway, and a regional preference flipping for a month or two is a wiggle rather than a reason to unwind.

The reverse is not true. A rotation to international while merely armed cancels the arm outright, and the module cannot re-arm until the strategy has passed through a Risk Off month first. The distinction is deliberate: a drawdown that fired during a period when the strategy preferred international is not a U.S. recovery, so returning to U.S. later is a new environment rather than a continuation.

The defensive side is not leveraged

Global Navigator 200's Risk Off holdings are the same as the base strategy's, unleveraged: EDV in the first month of a defensive run, TLT thereafter, and BOXX locked for the remainder of the run once the Treasury Duration Limiter fires.

This is worth stating explicitly because it is not true of Global Navigator 300, which substitutes the 3x Treasury fund TMF for EDV in the first defensive month. At 2x, leverage touches the equity position and nothing else.

Concentration

Global Navigator is concentrated by design, and the leveraged variants are more concentrated still. The base strategy holds a single ticker in about 67% of months; the leveraged variants do so in about 73%, because leverage collapses the two-position international pair into one leveraged U.S. position whenever it is deployed.

Combined with the 200% notional, that means there are stretches where the entire portfolio is one leveraged fund. If that is not something you want to own, the base strategy is the right version.

What leverage costs

January 1980 through September 2026, net of trading friction:

CAGRMax DrawdownMAR
Global Navigator+13.9%-23.1%0.60
Global Navigator 200+17.0%-23.1%0.74
S&P 500+12.0%-51.0%0.24

The identical maximum drawdown is not evidence that leverage is free. It means leverage happened not to be deployed during the episode that produced the worst drawdown, so the leveraged variant simply took the same loss as the base strategy. Read it as a fact about timing, not about cost.

What is notable here, and different from the Triad family, is that MAR improves rather than deteriorates. Because Global Navigator's leverage is applied to the whole portfolio only during recoveries the Risk On test has already validated, the extra return has historically arrived without a proportional increase in drawdown depth. That is a favorable historical record, not a guarantee, and the reason is worth understanding rather than trusting: it depends on the Risk On test continuing to keep leverage away from sustained declines.

Who it is for

Global Navigator 200 suits an investor who already wants Global Navigator, is comfortable holding a single position at a time, and accepts that during a deployment the entire portfolio moves at twice the index.

It is a poor fit if you would not hold the base strategy on its own merits, if holding one leveraged fund as your whole portfolio would trouble you, or if you are investing in a taxable account and are sensitive to short-term gains.

Global Navigator 300 runs the same module at 3x and additionally leverages the first month of the defensive position. It is a meaningfully different risk proposition, not simply more of this one.

The base strategy in brief

Global Navigator asks two questions each month. Should this money be in equities at all, answered by comparing the stronger of U.S. and international equities against T-bills. And if so, which region, answered by relative momentum between them. When the answer to the first is no, the Treasury Duration Limiter decides what kind of safety to hold, stepping down to short duration when long Treasuries are themselves losing money and locking that choice for the rest of the defensive run.

The full rules are on the Global Navigator strategy page.


Past performance, including backtested results, is not indicative of future results. Backtested performance is hypothetical, does not reflect actual trading, and benefits from hindsight in the selection of strategy rules. Portions of the long-term history rely on reconstructed proxy data for funds that did not exist for the full period. Leveraged ETFs carry risks beyond those of their unleveraged counterparts, including the effect of daily rebalancing on returns over holding periods longer than one day. Investors should carefully consider their risk tolerance and consult with a financial advisor.

For the latest details, visit www.DualMomentumSystems.com